“Clearly a Subjective Determination”: Interpretations of “Undue Suffering” at the Canada Agricultural Review Tribunal (2000–2019) - Ottawa Law Review

Volumes
Volume 53
Article

“Clearly a Subjective Determination”: Interpretations of “Undue Suffering” at the Canada Agricultural Review Tribunal (2000–2019)

Volume 53, Issue 2

Published

April 30, 2022

Section

Articles

Issue

Volume 53
· Issue 02

Author(s):

Andrew Stobo Sniderman

Statistics:

You May Also Like

One Rule to Rule Them All: Subordinate Legislation and the Law of Judicial Review

August 22, 2024

Mark P. Mancini

Administrative Law / Droit administratif, Constitutional Law / Droit constitutionnel

Les délais injustifiés dans l’administration publique : la décision de la Cour suprême du Canada dans l’arrêt Law Society of Saskatchewan c Abrametz

April 30, 2023

Paul Daly

Administrative Law / Droit administratif

What Meaning in a Right to Strike? Medreleaf and the Future of the Agricultural Employees Protection Act

January 1, 2022

Bethany Hastie

Administrative Law / Droit administratif, Constitutional Law / Droit constitutionnel, Labour and Employment Law / Droit du travail et de l’emploi

In June 2020, the Ontario Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeals Tribunal released its decision in UFCW v MedReleaf Phase 2. This decision focused on a constitutional challenge regarding the right to strike under the Agricultural Employees Protection Act, 2002 (AEPA)