{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Ottawa Law Review","provider_url":"https:\/\/rdo-olr.org\/fr\/","author_name":"Anubhuti Raje","author_url":"https:\/\/rdo-olr.org\/fr\/author\/raje\/","title":"The Emotional Architecture Of Justice: Why Feelings Belong In Courtrooms - Ottawa Law Review","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2P35fEm7Gl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/rdo-olr.org\/fr\/the-emotional-architecture-of-justice-why-feelings-belong-in-courtrooms\/\">The Emotional Architecture Of Justice: Why Feelings Belong In Courtrooms<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/rdo-olr.org\/fr\/the-emotional-architecture-of-justice-why-feelings-belong-in-courtrooms\/embed\/#?secret=2P35fEm7Gl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00ab\u00a0The Emotional Architecture Of Justice: Why Feelings Belong In Courtrooms\u00a0\u00bb &#8212; Ottawa Law Review\" data-secret=\"2P35fEm7Gl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/rdo-olr.org\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/rdo-olr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/shutterstock_1420924517-scaled-e1634670981407.jpg","thumbnail_width":1200,"thumbnail_height":801,"description":"By Anubhuti Raje* I. INTRODUCTION In the architecture of justice, reason is often cast as marble\u2013cold, stable, and immune to the tremors of human feeling. Legal education trains us to \u201cthink like lawyers\u201d, to analyze without sentiment, and argue without emotion. The law, we are told, must be rational to be fair. Yet beneath the [&hellip;]"}