<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/plugins/seriously-simple-podcasting/templates/feed-stylesheet.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"
	 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	 xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"
	 xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
	>
		<channel>
		<title>RDO | OLR</title>
		<atom:link href="https://rdo-olr.org/feed/podcast/ottawa-law-review-podcast/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		<link>https://rdo-olr.org/series/ottawa-law-review-podcast/</link>
		<description>From the Ottawa Law Review, a podcast series by law students about current legal issues. | Une série balado de la Revue de droit d&#039;Ottawa, crée par les étudiants en droit à propos des enjeux juridiques.</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 13:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<language>en-CA</language>
		<copyright>© 2025 RDO | OLR</copyright>
		<itunes:subtitle>Revue de droit d’Ottawa / Ottawa Law Review</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:author>Ottawa Law Review</itunes:author>
		<itunes:summary>From the Ottawa Law Review, a podcast series by law students about current legal issues. | Une série balado de la Revue de droit d&#039;Ottawa, crée par les étudiants en droit à propos des enjeux juridiques.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>RDO | OLR</itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>rdo-olr.enligne-online@uottawa.ca</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
			
		<itunes:category text="Education">
		</itunes:category>
		<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
							</itunes:category>
		<itunes:category text="News">
							</itunes:category>
		<podcast:locked owner="rdo-olr.enligne-online@uottawa.ca">yes</podcast:locked>
		<podcast:guid>5e5ae0a2-3ff1-5734-bbfd-6d646d929222</podcast:guid>
		
		<!-- podcast_generator="SSP by Castos/3.14.3" Seriously Simple Podcasting plugin for WordPress (https://wordpress.org/plugins/seriously-simple-podcasting/) -->
		<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

<item>
	<title>Episode 16: Debunking Myths in Canadian Law (Part II, French)</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/debunking-myths-in-canadian-law-part-ii-french/</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 15:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=32899</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Can counsel really bring out a “surprise witness” at trial like they do on TV shows? If you act in self-defence, do you automatically risk being charged? In this episode, Associate Editors Mariam Rofail and Océane Léla unravel fact from fiction and debunk some of the most common myths about Canadian law, from the disclosure of witnesses to self-defence, including the (often misunderstood) application of the Charter.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Can counsel really bring out a “surprise witness” at trial like they do on TV shows? If you act in self-defence, do you automatically risk being charged? In this episode, Associate Editors Mariam Rofail and Océane Léla unravel fact from fiction and debun]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Can counsel really bring out a “surprise witness” at trial like they do on TV shows? If you act in self-defence, do you automatically risk being charged? In this episode, Associate Editors Mariam Rofail and Océane Léla unravel fact from fiction and debunk some of the most common myths about Canadian law, from the disclosure of witnesses to self-defence, including the (often misunderstood) application of the Charter.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/32899/debunking-myths-in-canadian-law-part-ii-french.mp3" length="18968195" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Can counsel really bring out a “surprise witness” at trial like they do on TV shows? If you act in self-defence, do you automatically risk being charged? In this episode, Associate Editors Mariam Rofail and Océane Léla unravel fact from fiction and debunk some of the most common myths about Canadian law, from the disclosure of witnesses to self-defence, including the (often misunderstood) application of the Charter.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/RDO_Myths-episode-m4a-image.jpg"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>16:45</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/RDO_Myths-episode-m4a-image.jpg"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 16: Debunking Myths in Canadian Law (Part I, English)</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/debunking-myths-in-canadian-law-part-i-english/</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 18:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=32752</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Does freedom of contract really mean we can draft whatever agreement we want? Are criminal defence lawyers truly “on the side” of convicted criminals? In this episode, join Associate Editors Vincent Zeng and Esther Kim as they unpack—and debunk—some of the most common myths about Canadian law and the lawyers who practice it.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Does freedom of contract really mean we can draft whatever agreement we want? Are criminal defence lawyers truly “on the side” of convicted criminals? In this episode, join Associate Editors Vincent Zeng and Esther Kim as they unpack—and debunk—some of t]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Does freedom of contract really mean we can draft whatever agreement we want? Are criminal defence lawyers truly “on the side” of convicted criminals? In this episode, join Associate Editors Vincent Zeng and Esther Kim as they unpack—and debunk—some of the most common myths about Canadian law and the lawyers who practice it.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/32752/debunking-myths-in-canadian-law-part-i-english.mp3" length="26242133" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Does freedom of contract really mean we can draft whatever agreement we want? Are criminal defence lawyers truly “on the side” of convicted criminals? In this episode, join Associate Editors Vincent Zeng and Esther Kim as they unpack—and debunk—some of the most common myths about Canadian law and the lawyers who practice it.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>19:48</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Épisode 15: Le bilinguisme institutionnel vs individuel</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-15-institutional-vs-individual-bilingualism/</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 17:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=31352</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Join Associate Editors Averi Winn and Zac Auger as they discuss French language rights with lawyer Gabriel Poliquin and students from the University of Ottawa. The Ottawa Law Review thanks Averi for her hard work and dedication in planning, recording, and editing this episode. ]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Join Associate Editors Averi Winn and Zac Auger as they discuss French language rights with lawyer Gabriel Poliquin and students from the University of Ottawa. The Ottawa Law Review thanks Averi for her hard work and dedication in planning, recording, an]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Join Associate Editors Averi Winn and Zac Auger as they discuss French language rights with lawyer Gabriel Poliquin and students from the University of Ottawa. The Ottawa Law Review thanks Averi for her hard work and dedication in planning, recording, and editing this episode. ]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/31352/episode-15-institutional-vs-individual-bilingualism.mp3" length="33129043" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Join Associate Editors Averi Winn and Zac Auger as they discuss French language rights with lawyer Gabriel Poliquin and students from the University of Ottawa. The Ottawa Law Review thanks Averi for her hard work and dedication in planning, recording, and editing this episode.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>41:30</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Obiter Dicta</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/obiter-dicta/</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 16:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=31147</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[We promised to stay on topic… and then an obiter happened. Join Associate Editors Devon Lamont and Stephanie Katajamaki as they dive into the world of obiter dicta and play a guessing game about what some decisions are about, based on their obiter-esque comments. ]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[We promised to stay on topic… and then an obiter happened. Join Associate Editors Devon Lamont and Stephanie Katajamaki as they dive into the world of obiter dicta and play a guessing game about what some decisions are about, based on their obiter-esque ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[We promised to stay on topic… and then an obiter happened. Join Associate Editors Devon Lamont and Stephanie Katajamaki as they dive into the world of obiter dicta and play a guessing game about what some decisions are about, based on their obiter-esque comments. ]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/31147/obiter-dicta.mp3" length="26625086" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[We promised to stay on topic… and then an obiter happened. Join Associate Editors Devon Lamont and Stephanie Katajamaki as they dive into the world of obiter dicta and play a guessing game about what some decisions are about, based on their obiter-esque comments.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>26:10</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 13: Going (Pro)rogue?</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-13-going-prorogue/</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 02:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=30409</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Professor Vanessa MacDonnell joins Associate Editors Devon Lamont, Stephanie Katajamaki, and Zach Auger to dissect MacKinnon v Canada (Attorney General), a case challenging former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s decision to prorogue Parliament in January 2025. Later, OLR Submissions Manager, Mallory Dunlop, shares how she got involved in helping the Canadian Constitutional Law Initiative, an intervenor in the case, prepare its submissions.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Professor Vanessa MacDonnell joins Associate Editors Devon Lamont, Stephanie Katajamaki, and Zach Auger to dissect MacKinnon v Canada (Attorney General), a case challenging former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s decision to prorogue Parl]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Professor Vanessa MacDonnell joins Associate Editors Devon Lamont, Stephanie Katajamaki, and Zach Auger to dissect MacKinnon v Canada (Attorney General), a case challenging former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s decision to prorogue Parliament in January 2025. Later, OLR Submissions Manager, Mallory Dunlop, shares how she got involved in helping the Canadian Constitutional Law Initiative, an intervenor in the case, prepare its submissions.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/30409/episode-13-going-prorogue.mp3" length="64857702" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Professor Vanessa MacDonnell joins Associate Editors Devon Lamont, Stephanie Katajamaki, and Zach Auger to dissect MacKinnon v Canada (Attorney General), a case challenging former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s decision to prorogue Parliament in January 2025. Later, OLR Submissions Manager, Mallory Dunlop, shares how she got involved in helping the Canadian Constitutional Law Initiative, an intervenor in the case, prepare its submissions.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>1:07:50</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Are these Canada’s weirdest laws?</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/are-these-canadas-weirdest-laws/</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=30044</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[What do fortune tellers, nocturnal water-skiers, and royal pranksters all have in common? Listen to the latest episode of the OLR Podcast, hosted by Associate Editors Devon Lamont and Averi Winn, to find out!]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[What do fortune tellers, nocturnal water-skiers, and royal pranksters all have in common? Listen to the latest episode of the OLR Podcast, hosted by Associate Editors Devon Lamont and Averi Winn, to find out!]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[What do fortune tellers, nocturnal water-skiers, and royal pranksters all have in common? Listen to the latest episode of the OLR Podcast, hosted by Associate Editors Devon Lamont and Averi Winn, to find out!]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/30044/are-these-canadas-weirdest-laws.mp3" length="18527745" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[What do fortune tellers, nocturnal water-skiers, and royal pranksters all have in common? Listen to the latest episode of the OLR Podcast, hosted by Associate Editors Devon Lamont and Averi Winn, to find out!]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>14:48</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 12: The Making and Unmaking of a Great Canadian Law Firm</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-12-the-making-and-unmaking-of-a-great-canadian-law-firm/</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 02:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=28775</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Associate Editors Stephanie Katajamaki and Zach Auger sit down with Professor Adam Dodek to discuss his latest book, Heenan Blaikie: The Making and Unmaking of a Great Canadian Law Firm. Professor Dodek shares his thoughts on the importance of workplace culture to law firm success, offers a behind the scenes look at his research process, and highlights some of the lessons that law students can learn from Heenan Blaikie’s unprecedented collapse.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Associate Editors Stephanie Katajamaki and Zach Auger sit down with Professor Adam Dodek to discuss his latest book, Heenan Blaikie: The Making and Unmaking of a Great Canadian Law Firm. Professor Dodek shares his thoughts on the importa]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Associate Editors Stephanie Katajamaki and Zach Auger sit down with Professor Adam Dodek to discuss his latest book, Heenan Blaikie: The Making and Unmaking of a Great Canadian Law Firm. Professor Dodek shares his thoughts on the importance of workplace culture to law firm success, offers a behind the scenes look at his research process, and highlights some of the lessons that law students can learn from Heenan Blaikie’s unprecedented collapse.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/28775/episode-12-the-making-and-unmaking-of-a-great-canadian-law-firm.mp3" length="42069934" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Associate Editors Stephanie Katajamaki and Zach Auger sit down with Professor Adam Dodek to discuss his latest book, Heenan Blaikie: The Making and Unmaking of a Great Canadian Law Firm. Professor Dodek shares his thoughts on the importance of workplace culture to law firm success, offers a behind the scenes look at his research process, and highlights some of the lessons that law students can learn from Heenan Blaikie’s unprecedented collapse.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>41:52</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 11: &#8220;The Act of Judging in the Secular Age: the Case of April in AC v Manitoba&#8221;</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-11-the-act-of-judging-in-the-secular-age/</link>
	<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2024 03:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=28580</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Associate Editor Emily Gerges interviews Professor Christelle Landheer-Cieslak about her article “The Act of Judging in the Secular Age: the Case of April in AC v Manitoba”, published in volume 51, issue 1 of the Ottawa Law Review. The article analyzes AC v Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), a Supreme Court decision concerning the rights of minors to refuse medical treatment. The polarized decision highlights several contemporary issues. Listen to the episode to hear Professor Landheer-Cieslak's perspective on the legal and social effects of this decision.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Associate Editor Emily Gerges interviews Professor Christelle Landheer-Cieslak about her article “The Act of Judging in the Secular Age: the Case of April in AC v Manitoba”, published in volume 51, issue 1 of the Ottawa Law Review. The a]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Associate Editor Emily Gerges interviews Professor Christelle Landheer-Cieslak about her article “The Act of Judging in the Secular Age: the Case of April in AC v Manitoba”, published in volume 51, issue 1 of the Ottawa Law Review. The article analyzes AC v Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), a Supreme Court decision concerning the rights of minors to refuse medical treatment. The polarized decision highlights several contemporary issues. Listen to the episode to hear Professor Landheer-Cieslak's perspective on the legal and social effects of this decision.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/28580/episode-11-the-act-of-judging-in-the-secular-age.mp3" length="45354938" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Associate Editor Emily Gerges interviews Professor Christelle Landheer-Cieslak about her article “The Act of Judging in the Secular Age: the Case of April in AC v Manitoba”, published in volume 51, issue 1 of the Ottawa Law Review. The article analyzes AC v Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), a Supreme Court decision concerning the rights of minors to refuse medical treatment. The polarized decision highlights several contemporary issues. Listen to the episode to hear Professor Landheer-Cieslak's perspective on the legal and social effects of this decision.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>50:27</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 10: Robots, Regulation, and the Changing Nature of Public Space</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-10-robots-regulation-and-the-changing-nature-of-public-space/</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 22:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=27446</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[From “smart cities” to food delivery drones, a growing number of robots are entering our public spaces. How will the introduction of these robotic systems reshape the way we think about public versus private space? How will they impact privacy, accessibility, and the environment? How should the law respond? Associate Editors Ronald Cheung and Sean Cousins speak with robotics law Professor Kristen Thomasen about her Volume 51, Issue 2 article “Robots, Regulation, and the Changing Nature of Public Space.”]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[From “smart cities” to food delivery drones, a growing number of robots are entering our public spaces. How will the introduction of these robotic systems reshape the way we think about public versus private space? How will they impact privacy, accessibi]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[From “smart cities” to food delivery drones, a growing number of robots are entering our public spaces. How will the introduction of these robotic systems reshape the way we think about public versus private space? How will they impact privacy, accessibility, and the environment? How should the law respond? Associate Editors Ronald Cheung and Sean Cousins speak with robotics law Professor Kristen Thomasen about her Volume 51, Issue 2 article “Robots, Regulation, and the Changing Nature of Public Space.”]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/27446/episode-10-robots-regulation-and-the-changing-nature-of-public-space.mp3" length="52952398" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[From “smart cities” to food delivery drones, a growing number of robots are entering our public spaces. How will the introduction of these robotic systems reshape the way we think about public versus private space? How will they impact privacy, accessibility, and the environment? How should the law respond? Associate Editors Ronald Cheung and Sean Cousins speak with robotics law Professor Kristen Thomasen about her Volume 51, Issue 2 article “Robots, Regulation, and the Changing Nature of Public Space.”]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>1:04:18</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 9: Interpretations of “Undue Suffering” at the Canada Agricultural Review Tribunal</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-9-interpretations-of-undue-suffering-at-the-canada-agricultural-review-tribunal/</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 19:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=25076</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[For this bilingual episode of the Ottawa Law Review podcast, we discuss immigration and refugee law in Canada and its recent developments.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[For this bilingual episode of the Ottawa Law Review podcast, we discuss immigration and refugee law in Canada and its recent developments.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[For this bilingual episode of the Ottawa Law Review podcast, we discuss immigration and refugee law in Canada and its recent developments.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/25076/episode-9-interpretations-of-undue-suffering-at-the-canada-agricultural-review-tribunal.mp3" length="65143561" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[For this bilingual episode of the Ottawa Law Review podcast, we discuss immigration and refugee law in Canada and its recent developments.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>45:00</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 8: Pathways to Tort Liability for Harassment</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-8-pathways-to-tort-liability-for-harassment/</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2022 19:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=25072</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[For this bilingual episode of the Ottawa Law Review podcast, we discuss immigration and refugee law in Canada and its recent developments.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[For this bilingual episode of the Ottawa Law Review podcast, we discuss immigration and refugee law in Canada and its recent developments.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/25072/episode-8-pathways-to-tort-liability-for-harassment.mp3" length="57367640" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>39:36</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 7: AI and the Law</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-7-ai-and-the-law/</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2021 19:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=25063</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[For this bilingual episode of the Ottawa Law Review podcast, we discuss immigration and refugee law in Canada and its recent developments.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[For this bilingual episode of the Ottawa Law Review podcast, we discuss immigration and refugee law in Canada and its recent developments.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/25063/episode-7-ai-and-the-law.mp3" length="75059225" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>51:53</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 6: Immigration in Canada and the Safe Third Country Agreement</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-6-immigration-in-canada-and-the-safe-third-country-agreement/</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=1002</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[For this bilingual episode of the Ottawa Law Review podcast, we discuss immigration and refugee law in Canada and its recent developments.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[For this bilingual episode of the Ottawa Law Review podcast, we discuss immigration and refugee law in Canada and its recent developments.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/1002/episode-6-immigration-in-canada-and-the-safe-third-country-agreement.mp3" length="186478828" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>1:17:41</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 5: Supreme Court Case Watch with Kyle Kirkup and Vanessa Macdonnell</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-5-supreme-court-case-watch-with-kyle-kirkup-and-vanessa-macdonnell/</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=1003</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, a new logo, theme music, and a rigourous discussion of five cases to watch this fall at the Supreme Court of Canada.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, a new logo, theme music, and a rigourous discussion of five cases to watch this fall at the Supreme Court of Canada.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/1003/episode-5-supreme-court-case-watch-with-kyle-kirkup-and-vanessa-macdonnell.mp3" length="85378687" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>35:34</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 4: The Federal Carbon Tax – is it Constitutional?</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-4-the-federal-carbon-tax-is-it-constitutional/</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=1004</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, we dive into Saskatchewan and Ontario’s constitutional challenge of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act. Specifically, we discuss the legislative history of the Act; how it operates; and the arguments put forward by the two provinces and Canada.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, we dive into Saskatchewan and Ontario’s constitutional challenge of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act. Specifically, we discuss the legislative history of the Act; how it operates; and the arguments put forward by the two province]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/1004/episode-4-the-federal-carbon-tax-is-it-constitutional.mp3" length="176272313" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>1:13:26</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 3: Cannabis Legalization with Megan Wallace and Joël Dubois</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-3-cannabis-legalization-with-megan-wallace-and-joel-dubois/</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=1005</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Megan Wallace and Joël Dubois from Perley-Robertson, Hill & McDougall discuss the highs and lows of cannabis legalization in Canada for citizens, industries, employers, employees and more!]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Megan Wallace and Joël Dubois from Perley-Robertson, Hill & McDougall discuss the highs and lows of cannabis legalization in Canada for citizens, industries, employers, employees and more!]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/1005/episode-3-cannabis-legalization-with-megan-wallace-and-joel-dubois.mp3" length="161096235" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>1:07:07</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 2: The “Unfounded” Series and the Law of Evidence with Blair Crew and Constance Backhouse</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-2-the-unfounded-series-and-the-law-of-evidence-with-blair-crew-and-constance-backhouse/</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=1000</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Professors Backhouse and Crew from the University of Ottawa Faculty of Law discuss their involvement in the Globe and Mail’s “Unfounded” series on why Canadian police dismiss 1 in 5 sexual assault claims.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Professors Backhouse and Crew from the University of Ottawa Faculty of Law discuss their involvement in the Globe and Mail’s “Unfounded” series on why Canadian police dismiss 1 in 5 sexual assault claims.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/1000/episode-2-the-unfounded-series-and-the-law-of-evidence-with-blair-crew-and-constance-backhouse.mp3" length="102594548" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>42:44</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 1: Constitutional Law and Legal Ethics with Adam Dodek</title>
	<link>https://rdo-olr.org/podcasts/episode-1-constitutional-law-and-legal-ethics-with-adam-dodek/</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rdo-olr.org/?post_type=podcasts&#038;p=997</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this first episode, guest speaker Professor Adam Dodek from the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law discusses constitutional law, Chief Justice McLachlin’s legacy, Canada 150 and Indigenous legal issues, legal ethics, and the challenges facing young lawyers.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this first episode, guest speaker Professor Adam Dodek from the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Law discusses constitutional law, Chief Justice McLachlin’s legacy, Canada 150 and Indigenous legal issues, legal ethics, and the challenges facing young]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<enclosure url="https://rdo-olr.org/podcast-download/997/episode-1-constitutional-law-and-legal-ethics-with-adam-dodek.mp3" length="89903082" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>37:27</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[Ottawa Law Review]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:image href="https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Podcast-Logo-Final.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
